Allstate Insurance Company Driven by Greed

Ric Davis
Ric Davis
Contributor
Posted by Ric DavisJune 30, 2007 3:56 PM

Allstate Insurance Co.'s phenomenal growth in profits is directly tied to its drastic reduction in claims payments: The insurer offers paltry sums for legitimate claims, counting on its customers' unwillingness to slog through drawn-out litigation. That's no dark secret or allegation. It's a company policy called "Claims Core Process Redesign," devised by powerhouse corporate consultants McKinsey & Co. Its bland-sounding name hides a relentless drive to maximize shareholder profits at the expense of Allstate's customers.

Insurance companies regularly plead poverty, blaming trial lawyers, natural disasters, and even their own policyholders for their allegedly falling fortunes. But a look at their ledgers shows they are misleading the public. The industry's profits are skyrocketing, its executives are getting huge bonuses, and earnings have hit record heights--all while these companies deny coverage to their own customers for everything from Katrina damage to car crashes.

2 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

craig
Posted by craig
July 02, 2007 9:26 AM

Very well written, but very off base. Sounds like you are a bitter man who had a bad experience with an insurance company

Roger Poe
Posted by Roger Poe
July 03, 2007 1:22 PM

(b)Insurance & State Farm Insurance Supporters Mislead SE Texas Hurricane Rita Victims(/b)

State Farm and Allstate/Pilot Claim Service "adjusters" told untold thousands of hurricane Rita victims in South East Texas that blatant wind/debris damage* to asphalt shingle roofing systems was 'not really' damage to shingles, and/or 'damage our engineers do not recognize'.

(Audio documentation of an upper level State Farm "adjuster"/manager explaining their Rita "position" is available).

* 6-7 hours of wind borne debris being thrown at 90-100MPH+ against the outer [granule/bitumen] component of shingles, (which abrasive action can grind down the outer layer all the way down to the inner fiberglass mat), is wind damage State Farm and Allstate do NOT "recognize".

Too, wind broke/lifted tar sealant bonds on shingles. Debris then shimmed up the shingles, and debris also stuck to the tar sealant bonds, making it impossible for the shingles to reseal, and leaving the home and inhabitants vulnerable to further harm.

Again, State Farm and Allstate claimed that that those types of fiberglass shingle roofing system breakage 'is not damaged that they recognized'.

(As a side note, many of their loss claim "offers" (forgot) to include a basic sub-trade contractor overhead and profit valued line item of 29%, and many other claim estimates (forgot) to include a basic 49% primary/general contractor overhead and profit loss value).

In other words, according to the Texas Department of Insurance,** both Allstate and State Farm are collecting in real dollars Subcontractor and Primary-General Contractor overhead and profit loss values from the general public, but are keeping that money since most people don't realize it is part of the value of their loss they have pre-paid for every month in Replacement Cost policies/premiums.

..And their "adjusters" comply with such practices.

It also makes one wonder how the accountants juggle those windfalls?

** See Texas Department of Insurance Bulletin B0045-98 which describes primary/general contractor ovehead and profit values as being (financially/necessarily) factored into replacement costs of structures, and is pre-paid for by the general public, and IS TO BE DISCLOSED to claimants as part of the ACTUAL value of a [structural] "loss" dollars wise.

(b)Not doing so can create ILLEGAL windfall/profit.(/b)

Collecting money from consumers for anticipated potential full loss/replacement costs of a structure, which premium dollar costs include the need for a primary/general contractor to replace the structure, and then leaving out/NOT DISCLOSING BASIC 20-49+ contractor overhead and profit costs in "financially adjusted indemnificaion loss values", ALREADY ANTICIPATED, CHARGED FOR, AND COLLECTED, is theft of premiums, no?

(i)Dismissing/misrepresenting blatant roofing system wind damage, that is physically and factually nothing less than that, (and, oddly, previously recognized by Allstate & State Farm in other storms in the coastal states), to untold thousands of hurricane Rita victims in South East Texas/elsewhere, is intentional unfair trade practice, deceptive trade practice, and theft of premiums too, no?(/i)

rogerpoegc@gmail.com

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Greenville

InjuryBoard Greenville RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address